OK look at it this way - would you rather it was harmless urbexers who found the serious lack of security, or a gang of pikeys willing to rip the place up?
I understand that. I'm just saying that a.) it was bad timing (although, yes it was good timing from a exploring point of view), and b.) if it was to highlight the security issues, then it wouldn't be advertised on a public forum, he would of said to someone involved with Darlington FC if it was as much as a concern as he's trying to make out.
Like I said, all the negative attention would of been avoided if the reports were put up after Darlington FC's troubles had been resolved. Because it hasn't done them or our community any favors.
That is all